Strong competition does not remove opportunities from Australian commercial property. It changes where returns must come from.
When multiple buyers can access the same sales evidence, finance and market research, superior performance is less likely to result from predicting the market perfectly. It is more likely to come from disciplined acquisition, detailed asset management and a willingness to solve problems that other investors cannot price confidently.
Define the return before pursuing the asset
Investors should determine the required return and risk limits before becoming emotionally committed to a property.
The acquisition model should include:
- Purchase costs and duty
- Realistic finance terms
- Leasing incentives and fees
- Vacancy
- Non-recoverable outgoings
- Capital expenditure
- Tax assumptions
- Exit costs
- A conservative terminal value
If the investment works only under an optimistic exit yield, it does not offer an adequate margin of safety.
Focus on micro-markets
Commercial property is highly local.
Two industrial precincts in the same city may have different transport access, land supply and tenant demand. Office buildings a few streets apart may compete for different occupiers. Retail performance can change substantially across adjacent catchments.
Investors should understand the immediate competitive set: available space, upcoming developments, recent leasing deals, incentives, tenant movements and planning constraints.
Buy an executable business plan
Value-add opportunities are attractive only when the investor can implement them.
A credible business plan identifies:
- The target tenant
- Required works
- Approval pathway
- Programme and cost
- Leasing assumptions
- Funding source
- Contingency
- Expected increase in income or value
“Refurbish and re-lease” is not a strategy unless the demand, cost and timing have been tested.
Treat tenant retention as an investment
Retaining a good tenant can be more profitable than winning a replacement tenant, even when renewal requires capital or a temporary concession.
The comparison should include downtime, incentives, make-good uncertainty, leasing fees and refurbishment. Owners should engage tenants early enough to understand operational needs and address problems before the tenant enters the market.
Retention should not mean agreeing to any terms. It means comparing the whole-of-life economics of renewal with the realistic cost of vacancy.
Improve income quality
Small improvements to income can have an amplified effect on value, but only when they are durable.
Potential initiatives include:
- Recovering outgoings accurately
- Resolving arrears
- Activating underused areas
- Adding complementary services
- Improving signage or access
- Reconfiguring space for broader demand
- Negotiating stronger guarantees
- Extending lease duration at sensible rents
Investors should avoid changes that increase nominal rent while creating excessive incentives or tenant risk.
Use debt as a risk-management tool
The cheapest loan is not always the best loan.
Facility size, covenant flexibility, hedging, redraw capacity and the lender’s approach during leasing or redevelopment can be more important than a small difference in margin.
Debt should be structured around the asset’s business plan. A property facing a major vacancy should not be financed as though its income were permanently stable.
Create more than one exit
An asset with only one likely buyer pool is vulnerable when that group withdraws.
Returns can sometimes be improved by broadening the eventual market through:
- Longer or more diversified leases
- Improved environmental performance
- Separate titles
- Planning approvals
- Reduced deferred maintenance
- Better reporting and documentation
- A design capable of multiple uses
The aim is to make the asset easier to understand, finance and operate.
Measure return against risk and effort
A high projected internal rate of return may compensate for development, leasing or planning risk—or it may underestimate them.
Investors should compare expected return with the capital at risk, management effort, liquidity and range of potential outcomes. A lower-return asset with resilient income can be more valuable to a portfolio than a project with a higher forecast but a meaningful chance of capital loss.
In competitive Australian markets, sustainable outperformance usually comes from doing ordinary things exceptionally well: buying with discipline, understanding the tenant, controlling capital expenditure, structuring finance conservatively and creating an asset that the next owner will value more highly.
Join The Discussion